(04-13-2018 09:23 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(04-13-2018 08:28 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  They're out to get him at any cost

Dershowitz brings up a good point about the inherent potential violations of attorney-client privilege by having someone, even if it isn't the prosecution, review material that would be deemed privileged.

It does make me wonder though - if, as Dershowitz seems to suggests, attorney-client privilege was something so sacred that no one could ever review material deemed to fall under that umbrella, would that not just open up a very easy and legal way for people to conspire about committing crimes? I've read that the privilege is nullified if the material indicates the meeting was about furthering a crime, but is seems like Dershowitz suggests that even that would be covered because of his concerns about anyone, not just the prosecutors, reading the material.

The violations arent just of the attorney-client privilege; the actions implicate violations of the 4th and 6th amendments of the Constitution.