Lad, the mere idea that someone other than me would be privy to *any* client information I might hold is chilling. The level of active participant by an attorney needs to go well above the Godfather status ----

I can understand piercing the privilege with respect to one client. And, in fact, that has happened with respect to one client of mine before --- and the information was supplied to the court with the appropriate court order.

The idea that my entire set of client files would end up in governmental hands is, in fact, appalling. You singularly neglect the fact that the information of *all* of Cohen's clients are at issue here based on supposed Cohen-only misconduct. I hope this clears up my statement so that you may understand the depth of concern here.

The other singular fact here is that the main investigator conveniently refers the personal attorney to another authority --- and gets in all probability potential freebie into every single facet of the original target to boot. Yes, there are going to be *very* few situations where that is *not* going to be grotesque, to be honest. Mind boggingly few.... And, as I noted previously, I hope to god in a very perverse fashion that that happens. Otherwise the fallout will be inf--king enormous for a very long time.

In all aspects, a very real rubicon has been crossed with this action. So, to be blunt, probably to the point of truly being snide or a dick, I think I probably have a much greater and deeper appreciation of the issue than you do, to be honest.