(03-13-2018 01:26 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(03-13-2018 11:45 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(03-13-2018 11:36 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(03-13-2018 11:29 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(03-13-2018 07:56 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  The investigation has a logical basis - just because you disagree with it does not make it illogical. Members of the Trump campaign were aware of the DNC email hacks before the emails were released - and it seems perfectly logical to investigate whether or not there was cooperation between the Trump campaign and those responsible for the hacks (Russia).

so you think a deal was reached months before Trump even had the nomination for Russia to steal and publish the emails without editing in return for...what? Who was the genius that realized that publishing that Donna Brazile cheated for Hillary would turn Wisconsin red? and why did they decide to pass their communications over handshakes at state dinners.

Well, a lot of people believe that the world was created in six days. Because they choose to believe.

If I am on a grand jury, this is a no bill. If I am on a petit jury, this is a not guilty. You just cannot come in in and tell me he worked with the russians because one of his employees had suspicious deals with them years ago and he slept with a hooker and he is mean and rude. (stamp foot) Does not pass the sniff test.

I think the ones that it passes the sniff test for are the ones who think Trump stinks.

Lad, alone among the throng on your side, including the thoughtful people here and the ones burning dumpsters, you tried to make a narrative that made sense. You failed, but you tried. Can you rebuild that here again? Trace the evolution of the conspiracy. Give us the quid pro quo. Explain how Trump knew months before the election, before the nomination even, that all he needed was to publish Hillary's yoga schedule. If he did, smart man.

I think we could investigate the First Baptist Church of Dallas or Rice University for collusion with Mars, and come up with a list of OOJ and money laundering charges. Do you disagree?

Hahahaahahahahahahah

Yeah, your opinion on whether or not there is a narrative that makes sense really holds a lot of weight to me. At least you tried.

Dodging the challenge.

Always hard to talk logic with true believing conspiracy theorists. Might as well try to convince an Idaho militiaman that the government is NOT coming to take their guns.

What do you think of my last paragraph?

I'm not dodging - I've just done this song and dance with you for the past year and a half, and the needle hasn't moved. I've provided you with evidence of why the investigation isn't illogical, yet you just refuse to see logic in it. That's why I laughed.

I mean, let's do something really easy and LOGICAL. Assume the pee tape is real. All of a sudden, Putin has leverage over Trump. Putin could then say, let us help you get elected so you can, in return, not criticize me (Trump hasn't), not ratchet up sanctions (Trump still hasn't done that, despite them passing Congress), and push our interests (RNC changed their stance on Ukraine).

There is LOGIC there - whether it is plausible and likely is another story (mainly because I brought up the pee tape). I can think of plenty other logical reasons for why the Russian investigation is still on going, but you will fail to see logic in every one of them. I promise you that.

I would point out that while we have been singing and dancing with other, your needle hasn't moved either. Why should mine move and yours not? Oh, yeah, I am supposed to STFU.

Seems like your DeVos complaints, everybody's Trump complaints, and your complaint about me all fit one leftist mold - just agree with me, do it my way, or else you are wrong.

Trump and DeVos are criticized for not maintaining the policies and standards of the previous Administration. I am criticized for not seeing logic where there is none.

I heard Leebron was talking to some Canadians about moving Rice to Winnipeg. There is enough smoke right there to warrant an investigation. We won't know for sure if he is actually conspiring with the Canadians until the investigation is over and we get a report, so just STFU.

Logical?

I bet such an investigation would result in many indictments for OOJ and laundering. But the Leebron-Canada conspiracy? probably not. But nobody should ever make a peep about the silliness of it all.

Implausible logic, indeed.