(02-05-2018 06:05 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(02-05-2018 05:01 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(02-05-2018 03:39 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(02-04-2018 07:29 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(02-04-2018 04:59 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  Any opinion on the editing of Comey's presentation from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless"?

I would include that as part of my fact.

Other fact: Comey made the reopening of the investigation into the emails on Weiner's computer public before the election and before there was any evidence about them being new or old.

I want to say it was the NYTimes, but regardless, a detailed article was written about Comey. All signs point to Comey being a person who was put between a rock and a hard and place in the situation, and that in the situation he attempted to do what he felt was least partisan and was the most fair - which is why he felt the need to inform the public of those emails. Those actions both helped/hurt Clinton in the election.

Was this back when the Democrats hated Comey and wanted him fired?

Yep - this was back when the Dems were up in arms over his perceived bias against Clinton. They thought that Comey was siding with his fellow Republicans.

I think time has proven that this was as incorrect of a picture as the one you are suggesting. Comey, like plenty of other working men and women, appears to be someone who could put away their feelings/opinions about topics that their job requires them to deal with, and be as objective as possible.

I think the picture with which you disagree is mine. With what part or parts do you specifically disagree?