(12-02-2017 10:52 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  Since it has become such a sticking point for those who need preciseness in their lives, substitute “a ton of money” for “billion”.

Now, back to important things.

ABC retraction

From the link:

The original story implied possibly illegal actions by then-candidate Trump, but the clarification merely describes acts that would be normally expected by a president after he was elected.

Oh, the horror! Supposedly, a member of a President-elect’s transition team told another one to take steps to prepare them to hit the ground running. Clearly, we prefer our new Presidents to walk in cold on January 20.

But they will try to use Flynn to get Kushner in a misstatement, so they can charge him with perjury. What a goal. we spent and are spending gobs of money for this?

Just like with Beghazi, if this investigation goes past an initial one, then it makes sense to complain about the costs. But until it is wrapped up, the only way to assume that there is no rationale at all to investigate the Trump campaigns potential ties/connections to Russia, is if Robert Mueller and the rest of the investigators are absolutely corrupt and are running a partisan probe.

But like Owl# said, the investigation is not over, which means more issues may come to light - issues we don’t even know about yet.