(09-13-2016 09:22 PM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(09-13-2016 08:23 PM)Tiger87 Wrote:  

(09-13-2016 01:41 PM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(09-12-2016 10:24 PM)Tiger87 Wrote:  

(09-12-2016 09:23 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  First, that isn't up do date, but whatever.


Georgia Tech: brought in three 3*
Vandy: brought in 4* and 3* (two 3* committed for 2017)
UNLV: brought in 4* and 3*
WKU: top 5 recruiting class for 2017
TTech: (only two scholarships open) retained a verbal commit, brought in a 3*

Memphis: coach brought one TT signee, got a grad transfer, got a 0 star, and has four scholarships open. NO commits for 2017 yet. Oh, yeah, and he couldn't keep Charlie Moore who ended up signing with Cuonzo at California.

So I point out that our recruiting this year is better than the norm for coaches in their 1st year at a new school.
You don't like it and indicate that it's false.
I provide you with a link to show recruiting rankings where it's obvious that - as poor as our class is this year - it's actually better than the norm for coaches in their 1st year at a new school.
You try to refute this by showing 5 schools was some anecdotal info.
Laughable.
You left out at least 20 other schools who changed coaches. That sort of calibrates the mean.
Of the 5 schools you cherry pick, our class is better than 2 of those.
If we're going by facts, you've got the inside track on worst post of 2016.
But, hey, if we're sticking with the agenda script regardless of facts, you're solid.

Nothing you just wrote is accurate.

good grief

5 star retort, chief.

Nah. Just a 1-star retort. I'll save the 5-stars for serious debaters - and not waste on trolls.