(09-11-2016 10:31 AM)2tigers Wrote:  

(09-11-2016 08:13 AM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  

(09-10-2016 05:19 PM)MTigerBlue Wrote:  

(09-10-2016 02:27 PM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(09-10-2016 02:26 PM)salukiblue Wrote:  Well, since you like it, you can do it yourself.

I'll help you with the process:

Find Clergeot's recruiting ranking.

Then go to the previous three years of recruiting rankings and look at the frosh averages of all the guys five spots above and below that ranking.

Take the median number and that will give you an idea of what to expect from Clergeot.

And don't think this is some anti-Tubby thing. I had to help a Temple fan with this a few years ago and, of course, I was correct in my assessment.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-627812-post-920...pid9200920

P.S.

After you "stat it up" let us all know what you find. Since, you know, you like statistical analysis.

So, that's what you mean when you say things like "every statistical guideline?" LOL, still not sure what that phrase even means!

Tell you what -- before I waste any time on your methodology, why don't you validate it by posting the last three years' worth of predictions that it's made for players in those same spots and the ensuing correlation coefficient so we'll all know how much confidence to put in your statistical "guidelines?" OK?

I mean, I'm sure you've hit on the most accurate scoring and rebounding predictor -- what number a particular rating service ranks a kid -- rather than a bunch of irrelevant stuff like whether he starts or doesn't see the floor for the team that signs him, whether he plays point guard or center, what he's done previously -- you know, drivel like that. But I'd still like to see the numbers, so again, why don't you post them?

Does the term "glutton for punishment" mean anything to you?

Yea! Your 43,608 posts and reply's.