(04-18-2018 11:02 AM)McKinney Wrote:  These renderings have been around for several years. I believe they were first shown "publicly" (in the Football Performance Center) in August of 2015. However they could be even older than that. The image shows the old "UM" logo on the field, that was used from the mid 2000s right up until maybe the first season of FBS (2012). Also, the posters on the backside of the east grandstand feature players wearing black uniforms which is something from the Molnar era (2012 and 2013 seasons).

I hadn't seen these previously, but that's exactly the approach I was suggesting.

(04-18-2018 12:03 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Part of the McGuirk problem is ADA. Gutting the building and bringing to code is probably just as expensive and leveling it.

My suggestion is that no part of the existing building be gutted.

As far as the ADA, I do not understand the ADA to require every part of a building to be ADA compliant. Every stall in the bathroom doesn't have to be a handicapped stall, every parking space doesn't have to be a handicapped space. ADA compliance could be met by providing adequate facilities in the new structure.