Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Transformation vs Incrementalism
Author Message
tanqtonic Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 19,153
Joined: Nov 2016
Reputation: 775
I Root For: rice
Location:
Post: #667
RE: Transformation vs Incrementalism
(10-19-2018 12:12 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(10-19-2018 12:10 AM)Antarius Wrote:  
(10-18-2018 11:53 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(10-18-2018 09:41 PM)Antarius Wrote:  
(10-18-2018 09:38 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  Yeah, and I should have married Janis instead of Donna, and I should not have loaned that money to Fred, but can we start living in the here and now? Dwelling on past mistakes seems very unproductive.

Heads havent rolled. Let's imagine you should not have loaned that money to Fred..then you do it 10 times.

Yeah, sorry - past mistakes dont justify ongoing stupidity

Dwelling on what somebody else should have done in 1989 or 1968 or 2004 or 2012 is not helpful unless you are writing a history book.

so what heads do you want rolled now, in 2018?

And what is the ongoing stupidity you speak of and who is using past mistakes to justify it? I hear nobody saying that because we we kept Bailiff 11 years we have to keep Bloomgren 11 years. Is that what you are hearing?

Be specific.

The same people who kept Bailiff here 11 years are still around, still wielding influence. You think the 25(0) and others magically packed up with their misguided judgement and walked away?

Yes, Bailiff is gone. But Bailiff wasnt the extent of the problem. The system that hired and kept a guy like Bailiff was. So yes, it's good he is gone - he was a trainwreck, but the structure that led to a trainwreck is still here. I've been plenty specific. Over and over again. It's not about keeping Bailiff 11 years so we keep someone else 11 years - this has nothing to do with Bailiff.

You have BOT members and 25(0) crew who are grossly out of their depth making decisions. Hence the only decision they know is to concede after Rice hits rock bottom... not an ounce of proactive common sense. We fired Braun, Greenspan, William's, Bailiff only after we hit absolute rock bottom. None of these were surprises- except to the decision makers.

So yeah, no more senile Al Davis. No more megalomaniacal Jerry Jones.

Roll. Heads. Roll.

Specific enough?

Nowhere near.


I said be specific. Name names. The only names you mentioned are Al Davis and Jerry Jones.

Whose head(s) should be rolling?

Those whose heads *should* roll. Cmon get with the baying Mob with this.....

Ooooohh, last comment made me think of something...... can CNN say the name of the Rice Band now?
10-19-2018 08:14 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Transformation vs Incrementalism - GoodOwl - 01-10-2015, 02:40 PM
RE: Transformation vs Incrementalism - tanqtonic - 10-19-2018 08:14 AM
Transformation vs Incrementalism - chrisc - 10-13-2019, 09:27 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.