(01-21-2015 12:31 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(01-21-2015 11:41 AM)waltgreenberg Wrote:  

(01-21-2015 11:29 AM)GoodOwl Wrote:  

(01-21-2015 11:13 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(01-21-2015 10:54 AM)GoodOwl Wrote:  The points remain valid whether he improves or he goes. They remain for whoever would take over. After ignoring the points for 40 years, we need to be vigilant in keeping them up front constantly.

If we judge the next guy on the same basis as Bailiff is judged(top 50 results, playing freshmen, etc), fine with me. Fairness is what I would like to see, and failing that, even-handedness will do.

I will. I can't speak for anyone else. I believe we have to do that in order for Rice to get where we say we want it to go, in my opinion.

And why the heck wouldn't we? OO, you act as if we're singling out DB and judging him differently than we would anybody else or any of our other coaches. That is simply not true.

I think it is true.

I predict the next guy will get a free pass on many of the things that Bailiff does that are harped on. Specifically, I bet there won't be a peep if he attempts a FG on 4th and 1 from the 4 in the first quarter of his first opportunity game. I bet there won't be a peep about his playing seniors.

JMHO, but one that someday we can test.