(12-06-2014 04:01 PM)completely_bias Wrote:  

(12-06-2014 03:16 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(12-06-2014 03:04 PM)completely_bias Wrote:  

(12-06-2014 02:10 PM)HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Wrote:  

(12-06-2014 02:00 PM)completely_bias Wrote:  How can you add Cincinnati to South Eastern Conference when the when the program is located in a completely different geographic location?

Because Missouri and Texas just screams Southeastern.

anything west of Texas would be pushing it

The Houston area of Texas could probably be considered more Southeastern in culture than Southwestern thus why The Aggies fit.

Anything west of that though, definitely Southwest not Southeast. Texas is far too large and far too diverse to make the statement that you did.

I do agree with you that the best bet for the SEC would be Texas and Oklahoma, that is a no brainer and would be the case for any conference.

My question to you though would be whether or not you actually believe that could happen?

I personally am under the impression that Texas believes that staying put where they are is the most financially lucrative option, that being said I still believe that the lore of the SEC power is too much to resist

Then I don't think you understand just how big of a pill it would be for Longhorn Ego's to swallow in terms of them being seen as following The Aggies. No way, sorry.