(02-27-2012 10:10 PM)adcorbett Wrote:  

(02-27-2012 05:13 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(02-27-2012 02:34 PM)adcorbett Wrote:  

(02-22-2012 02:39 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  ... which was a pointless thing to do, since i called Cincy a "small-time" program in relation to UK, Indiana, and Ohio State, not Georgetown. If you want to keep whining about me referring to the Bearcats as small-time, then do so in the context that i used the term, not your own stupid and meaningless context.

You are fighting a losign battle here. You will nto get anyone to agree with you that Cinciannit is a "small time" program compared to anybody. They may not be on the level of the "Big Six" programs, but are generally considered to be in that second tier of programs, whcih includes the likes of Louisville, Michigan State, UConn, Syracuse, Ohio State, Oklahoma, and Oklahoma St, etc, the 7-15 programs. They are most certainly in that area by just about any assessment (save for the ESPN one that mysteriously starts with when Duke became hot again in the mid 80's).

Nope, IMO Cincy is clearly in a tier that would encompass say the 25-40 most recognizable college basketball brands. 7-15 is way too high, they are clearly not in the same league with Syracuse, Uconn, Ohio State, etc.

You are out of your ******* mind, and clearly are absolutely. Lidless about college basketball history.

I'm shocked that someone with good knowledge of television would doubt that Cincy's historical basketball achievements have little to do with their recognizabiliity as a basketball brand in today's media environment, and in that environment, they are a 25-40 program, with much less visibility than an Ohio State. I am stunned.