Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Toledo fans still wrong
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
rocketfootball Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 26,857
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 18
I Root For: Toledo
Location:

CrappiesCrappiesCrappiesCrappies
Post: #21
 
Redwingtom Wrote:
Photodan Wrote:
BGFan2006 Wrote:We only play our other 2 QB's (who are also good) when we are comfortably ahead of our opponent.
You're right. With your crappy defense, only having a four touchdown lead is pretty tenuous.

-Dan
I can't believe a Tole_o fan would make such an intelligent comment...oh wait...yes I can :withstupid:
Your defense gave up 34 points to NIU and 35 points to a terrible Marshall offense.

We gave up half that to NIU, 17. You are too engrossed in our first two games. It isn't game 3 of the season, it is game 11.
11-14-2004 09:25 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BGFan2006 Offline
Water Engineer
*

Posts: 89
Joined: Nov 2004
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #22
 
rocketfootball Wrote:
Redwingtom Wrote:
Photodan Wrote:
BGFan2006 Wrote:We only play our other 2 QB's (who are also good) when we are comfortably ahead of our opponent.
You're right. With your crappy defense, only having a four touchdown lead is pretty tenuous.

-Dan
I can't believe a Tole_o fan would make such an intelligent comment...oh wait...yes I can :withstupid:
Your defense gave up 34 points to NIU and 35 points to a terrible Marshall offense.

We gave up half that to NIU, 17. You are too engrossed in our first two games. It isn't game 3 of the season, it is game 11.
We played a VERY different NIU team than you did, ask anyone. Our D was weak yesterday (didn't I already say that?) and Marshall shouldn't have been able to put up that many points in the 1st half. But they did, and shut them up HARD 2nd half. Besides our offense is freaking AMAZING and made up for it by putting up more points on Marshall than anyone has in a long time.
11-14-2004 01:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Proud traitor.
*

Posts: 30,479
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 515
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Post: #23
 
rocketfootball Wrote:
Redwingtom Wrote:
Photodan Wrote:
BGFan2006 Wrote:We only play our other 2 QB's (who are also good) when we are comfortably ahead of our opponent.
You're right. With your crappy defense, only having a four touchdown lead is pretty tenuous.

-Dan
I can't believe a Tole_o fan would make such an intelligent comment...oh wait...yes I can :withstupid:
Your defense gave up 34 points to NIU and 35 points to a terrible Marshall offense.

We gave up half that to NIU, 17. You are too engrossed in our first two games. It isn't game 3 of the season, it is game 11.
WMU? CMU?

Nice try ...but I don't think you will get too many people outside of Toledo to agree with you here.
11-14-2004 04:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Falcon Frenzy Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 836
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #24
 
utpotts Wrote:maybe be BG should beat a team with a winning record first, before talkin about stats that were padded against teams that have a combined record of 14-41!
Now Toledo's 23-48 combined record of teams they have beat is so so so much better than BG's 24-57 combined record of teams they have beat. I wouldn't be biting at the chomps if I were you when UT got smoked by a 3-7 Kansas team.

BG played the same division teams as Toledo did. Played the same crossover game against Ohio. BGs non-conference games have a better combined record than Toledo's out of conference games. 15-15 for BG and 11-20 for UT non-conference record for those keeping score at home.

And you want to talk about schedule strength???? LOL
11-16-2004 07:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Falcon Frenzy Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 836
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #25
 
rocketfootball Wrote:
BGFan2006 Wrote:We only play our other 2 QB's (who are also good) when we are comfortably ahead of our opponent.  We never just assume a game is over, anything can happen.  But thanks for looking out for our Omar, but he can look after himself!  No one's anywhere near him!
That's fine, but if something would have happened to Omar you can't tell me that there wouldn't have been an uproar from BG fans. That was just plain stupid on Brandon's part.
Amazing how UT fans can criticize other teams and coaches and yet its like calling the kettle black. Rf, what about against Ball State when UT was up 31-14 at half, 38-14 after 3, and didn't pull Gradkowski till at least 7:30 left in the 4th quarter after they made it 52-14? I mean that was against Ball State for God's sake.
11-16-2004 07:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rocketfootball Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 26,857
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 18
I Root For: Toledo
Location:

CrappiesCrappiesCrappiesCrappies
Post: #26
 
Falcon Frenzy Wrote:
rocketfootball Wrote:
BGFan2006 Wrote:We only play our other 2 QB's (who are also good) when we are comfortably ahead of our opponent.  We never just assume a game is over, anything can happen.  But thanks for looking out for our Omar, but he can look after himself!  No one's anywhere near him!
That's fine, but if something would have happened to Omar you can't tell me that there wouldn't have been an uproar from BG fans. That was just plain stupid on Brandon's part.
Amazing how UT fans can criticize other teams and coaches and yet its like calling the kettle black. Rf, what about against Ball State when UT was up 31-14 at half, 38-14 after 3, and didn't pull Gradkowski till at least 7:30 left in the 4th quarter after they made it 52-14? I mean that was against Ball State for God's sake.
First, I never said I agreed with Gradkowski playing as long as he has in a few of our games. You can check all you want, and you might even find posts from me wondering why Gradkowski did play as long as he did.

Second, you are on crack if you think it was a good decision to keep Omar in the game. It wasn't like Brandon was passing the ball all over trying to score more points to impress the voters. It was just plain stupid.
11-16-2004 07:47 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rocketfootball Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 26,857
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 18
I Root For: Toledo
Location:

CrappiesCrappiesCrappiesCrappies
Post: #27
 
Falcon Frenzy Wrote:
utpotts Wrote:maybe be BG should beat a team with a winning record first, before talkin about stats that were padded against teams that have a combined record of 14-41!
Now Toledo's 23-48 combined record of teams they have beat is so so so much better than BG's 24-57 combined record of teams they have beat. I wouldn't be biting at the chomps if I were you when UT got smoked by a 3-7 Kansas team.

BG played the same division teams as Toledo did. Played the same crossover game against Ohio. BGs non-conference games have a better combined record than Toledo's out of conference games. 15-15 for BG and 11-20 for UT non-conference record for those keeping score at home.

And you want to talk about schedule strength???? LOL
Kansas has started 4 different QB's this year because of injuries. That has a lot to do with them being 3-7 after they started the season 2-0.
11-16-2004 07:48 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Falcon Frenzy Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 836
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #28
 
rocketfootball Wrote:
Falcon Frenzy Wrote:
utpotts Wrote:maybe be BG should beat a team with a winning record first, before talkin about stats that were padded against teams that have a combined record of 14-41!
Now Toledo's 23-48 combined record of teams they have beat is so so so much better than BG's 24-57 combined record of teams they have beat. I wouldn't be biting at the chomps if I were you when UT got smoked by a 3-7 Kansas team.

BG played the same division teams as Toledo did. Played the same crossover game against Ohio. BGs non-conference games have a better combined record than Toledo's out of conference games. 15-15 for BG and 11-20 for UT non-conference record for those keeping score at home.

And you want to talk about schedule strength???? LOL
Kansas has started 4 different QB's this year because of injuries. That has a lot to do with them being 3-7 after they started the season 2-0.
Barmann started the first 8 games, he hasn't played in the last 2. Nice try.
11-17-2004 12:39 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rocketfootball Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 26,857
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 18
I Root For: Toledo
Location:

CrappiesCrappiesCrappiesCrappies
Post: #29
 
Falcon Frenzy Wrote:
rocketfootball Wrote:
Falcon Frenzy Wrote:
utpotts Wrote:maybe be BG should beat a team with a winning record first, before talkin about stats that were padded against teams that have a combined record of 14-41!
Now Toledo's 23-48 combined record of teams they have beat is so so so much better than BG's 24-57 combined record of teams they have beat. I wouldn't be biting at the chomps if I were you when UT got smoked by a 3-7 Kansas team.

BG played the same division teams as Toledo did. Played the same crossover game against Ohio. BGs non-conference games have a better combined record than Toledo's out of conference games. 15-15 for BG and 11-20 for UT non-conference record for those keeping score at home.

And you want to talk about schedule strength???? LOL
Kansas has started 4 different QB's this year because of injuries. That has a lot to do with them being 3-7 after they started the season 2-0.
Barmann started the first 8 games, he hasn't played in the last 2. Nice try.
Barmann got hurt against Oklahoma. Kansas' losses before OU were by 3, 1, and 6 points. They were 3-3. Since then they are 0-4 and have lost by 31, 6, 9, and 4 points. They still haven't lost by a lot except for against OU, but they are losing every game now. Hard to believe a team is 3-7 when 6 of their losses are by single digits and 5 of them are by 6 points or less against Big 12 competition. Not as bad as their record indicates.
11-17-2004 08:29 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2018 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2018 MyBB Group.