(06-15-2021 01:13 PM)GreenBison Wrote:  

(06-15-2021 12:00 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  

(06-15-2021 11:35 AM)GreenBison Wrote:  

(06-15-2021 11:32 AM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  

(06-15-2021 11:18 AM)GreenBison Wrote:  It's exactly what you are trying to be or else you wouldn't say P6. They are P5, if you were part of their group it would be a P6. My question is why aren't we all just FBS? The AAC is a classic example of the Napoleon Complex

If the P5 found value in the AAC then you'd already be part of their party, but you don't offer them anything of value. So here you sit, the tallest midget with the rest of the G5ers.

5 Year Attendance Average per Conference...
MAC - 15697
SB - 17583
CUSA 19593
MW - 23880
AAC - 29553
Indy - 35178
--------------------------
ACC - 48432
P12 - 48753
B12 - 57135
B10 - 65369
SEC - 75704

https://collegefootballnews.com/2020/03/...m-analysis

I guess reading comprehension isn't your thing.

Attendance and Revenue you are much closer to G5 than P5. What part of that do you not understand?

1. The very numbers you provided show that CUSA is 66% of the AAC and the AAC is 61% of the ACC and the PAC
2. In the "what part do you not understand" category, P6 is a strategy of progress to aspirational goals, not a snapshot today.

see you in September

10,000 difference between CUSA and AAC
20,000 difference between AAC and ACC

Click on the article. Under the AAC list they've accidentally added a 12th team to your conference, so your total average is actually less than what is posted. Also, should we compare attendance versus home town population? Just to illustrate how much support some teams have in their own towns.

Ummm, they have UConn in because it's a five year average and UConn was part of the AAC.

They left out Tulsa and put in Florida International. Which by the way has worse attendance than Tulsa. So the actual number for the AAC is higher and the number for CUSA is lower.

Can we all just agree you aren't very good at this?