(07-29-2020 01:22 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-29-2020 12:56 PM)vandiver49 Wrote:  

(07-29-2020 11:50 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(07-29-2020 07:44 AM)vandiver49 Wrote:  If it's Harris that means the DNC establishment is trying to regain control of the party IMO. Kamala isn't one to go off the rails like Abrams or Warren might. Her policies might seem weird to the rest of the country, but are inline with what California politicians would like to see implemented nationwide.

Warren is still kind of establishment.

Neither as much as Rice.

Warren is a crusader, much like Ralph Nader. This is the key difference between her and Harris IMO. Rice is no different than HRC.

in simpler terms, "no choice"...

Normally the VP doesn't matter much, but since few people believe Biden will make it past year 2 of his term if elected, I feel the scrutiny is important. As such, if it has to be a minority female (don't @ me with that PoC BS), I see Harris as the only viable choice.