The unofficial online home for fans of the University of Cincinnati Bearcats. Part of Collegiate Sports Nation (CSN).

(04-14-2020 02:37 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  

(04-14-2020 01:26 PM)Cataclysmo Wrote:  The 100,000 person claim was based off the contagion rate of the virus + cases that had arisen without known contact to previous cases. So if someone in Cleveland tested positive for it, and then someone in Toledo tested positive for it, and they have no known connection between the cases, they begin to estimate how many people have it based on where people are, what the contagion factors are, etc etc. It's an entire field of study called epidiomology. And, like anything else, it's not perfect. But it's not baseless, either. We don't have nearly enough tests to even comprehend how widespread the virus is. It's entirely possible that Acton was completely right when she said that.

If a Pilot tells passengers to prepare for severe turbulence, and instead there are only moderate disruptions, do you also conclude that you know how to fly the plane better than the Pilot?

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiUyGfDJ76g

Wow.

You go on believing what you want.

Yeah why trust people who spend their careers working in this department, and who have been open and transparent about the data leading them to various conclusions, when you can instead listen to an angry message board poster keep screaming about fake news to a pile of dead bodies.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk