(02-12-2020 10:35 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(02-12-2020 10:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-12-2020 09:25 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(02-12-2020 09:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-11-2020 08:54 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  You're kidding, right?

Not at all. The only thing I've heard are those saying things to the effect that loyalty should not equal breaking the law. I've never heard anyone EVER claim your cabinet should be non-partisan. And hell, even Obama tried to get a Republican or two in his cabinet...I don't see much of anything like that from trump, not anyone coming close to demanding it.

Wow! Just wow!

Okay....just saying I've heard no such thing. Can you source any comments from anyone regarding this?

For starters, the disgust that Trump would even ask an appointee about loyalty. The outrage that Barr would not turn against Trump over a Mueller report that said essentially nothing would be another instance. The admiration for Vindman (a "decorated war hero" with one Purple Heart and one year of combat in a 21-year career, at a time when many were pulling 2 and 3 coat tours) for disclosing classified information outside his chain of command to persons who may have had the clearance but may not have had the need to know pretty clearly describes what is expected by the left. And the information disclosed by Vindman doesn't even add up to anything material.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Barr is the AG of the United States, not donald trump, right?

And FTR - Didn't the Mueller report point out several things that congress could investigate trump on for potential impeachable offenses if they so choose? And didn't he say it was not his charge to make those determinations?