(11-26-2019 09:49 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-26-2019 09:20 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(11-26-2019 08:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-25-2019 06:45 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(11-25-2019 03:08 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  You sound confident he doesnt. Let's see what Schiff says when he is placed under oath in front of the Senate.

ps...Schiff knows the identity of the WB.

Of course he does. Anyone believing any different is just lying or not paying attention. I’m not sure which one RWT is. To many of their Star witnesses have close personal ties to the guy. You know, that guy Eric Ciaramella.

Sure, Schiff MAY know who the WB is. GWB by h MAY have also purposely lied us into a war to avenge a death threat on his daddy. However, I don't post that as a fact because I don't know that it is...just as none of you know Schiff knows the identity of the WB.

What I do know as fact is that Eric Ciaramella hasn’t charged a lawyer to stop being identified all over the media as the WB. And I know that Shiffty abruptly ends questioning that gets near his identity. Hard to do that if you don’t know who he is.

Why is that hard? Schiff firmly believes, as do I and countless others, that regardless of any particular law that says the WB can't be named...that in fact, the guy/gal should not be named. So yeah, he should be shutting down those lines of questioning as he did. Trying to name him is nothing but Republican political theater and it has nothing to do with the impeachment inquiry.

If it has nothing to do with it then why did Shiffty do an about face on him testifying? If he has no value as a witness then how does he have value as a legitimate WB? It was a setup. That is why he can’t let him be publicly identified and questioned. Not to mention their star witness mr Vindman would probably be in legal peril.