(10-11-2019 03:02 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  But I get it. You've already sold your soul to the devil in trump here, so at this point, you might as well just go down with the ship. Sad.

I'll repeat what I said earlier... like the rest of the left, you have a habit of accusing others of what you're guilty of.

To argue that the left hasn't been trying to find literally ANYTHING to pin on Trump since day one is ridiculous. Facts be damned, you just KNOW there is a crime here somewhere, and until you find one, you will continue to say 'we don't know enough'.

You're 'I'll admit it' is transparent. The only way you'd admit it is if he could PROVE his innocence TO YOUR SATISFACTION.

There is no way nor any circumstance under which you would ever say that Trump had PROVED his innocence.

You still haven't admitted that you were wrong about his collusion with Russia.

Trump may well be guilty. I have no idea... but I DO know that 'what we know' is a sentence in search of a crime.

Heck, even your own claim is that this isn't the entire transcript... BECAUSE you need 'what we don't know' in order to imply a crime.

Yep, heaven forbid a President would encourage another President to investigate corruption on a recorded line. He should have done what Obama did and tell Biden to go do it in a closed door session, or else..