The unofficial online home for fans of the University of Cincinnati Bearcats. Part of Collegiate Sports Nation (CSN).

(06-28-2019 06:12 AM)MickMack Wrote:  

(06-27-2019 06:51 PM)QSECOFR Wrote:  

(06-27-2019 06:43 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  One thing's for sure, if we did not land this kid there were plenty of other suitors that would've. This social media stuff involving "sexting" between MINORS is not uncommon. Doesn't make it right but it happens a lot. The kid didn't assault anyone, breaking and entering, theft, vandalism, selling weed, etc. He made a mistake and he's owned up to it. Move on and get it done on/off the court and in the classroom.

The original charges involved quite a bit more than what you indicate. It was alleged in the charges that he tried to coerce the young lady into performing sex acts.

Via the plea bargain, he was never convicted of that. To be sure, there was more than “you show me yours and I’ll show you mine” going on.

To be sure? Really? Where's your proof? Not sure what commie infested remote location you're posting from. But here, in America, you're innocent until proven guilty. If the original charges were so self-evident why did they take a plea deal?

1) A poster asked about the charges and I posted facts.

2) Some posters pretended the original felony charges didn't exist. I corrected that notion.

3) I am not, not have I ever, been associated any communist or socialist party. Moreover, I have been a resident of Hamilton County, Ohio for the entirety of my life.

4) I never said that he was guilty before a trial occurred and you know that to be true.

5) You are assuming that the prosecution is the party who first proffered a deal. Other than the two parties and their respective legal representatives, I am willing to bet that you don't know who first brought up a plea deal. Interestingly enough, that doesn't seem to be a problem for you to post "facts".