(03-13-2018 09:53 PM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(03-13-2018 01:54 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-13-2018 12:51 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(03-13-2018 12:44 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-13-2018 12:41 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  Again Tom, if money piling into the Clinton Foundation while Cankles was SOS doesn't cause you a bit of concern, then I have to question how serious you were in your original post.

If you're interested, the info's out there, all the smelly deals while she was SOS with obvious quid pro quo for donations.

This is a case where I'm afraid you're guilty of exactly what you accuse others of doing......looking the other way while your team gets away with murder.

Show me something concrete and I'll be concerned. There is nothing concrete that I've seen. And no, that Clinton Cash rag was not concrete.

Like I said, compare the depth and breath of the millions in donations to the Clinton Foundation while Cankles was SOS to your original post here, that's all I ask. This is a rare case where I believe you're totally full of shyte and exhibiting malleable princples. That's fine, as a liberal, you certainly have that right.

That in no way means there was any quid pro quo. Hillary took no salary from the foundation then or ever...and she certainly wasn't making any bank on foundation travel or meals as that would have all been on the govt dime. Not to mention monies donated to the foundation by and large went to worthy charitable causes.

Show me some decision she made to favor any donors? And no, Uranium 1 was not one of them.

All I ask is for evidence. If it's credible, I'll gladly condemn. Talk about a witch hunt (no pun intended)! This decades long attempt to smear Hillary has been nothing short of ridiculous.

I guess Hillary shipped $100 billion in weapons to Saudi Arabia based on their strong human/women's/gay rights record instead of their $10-25 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation?