OdinFrigg
Gone Fishing
Posts: 1,875
Joined: Oct 2017
Reputation: 458
I Root For: Canine & Avian
Location: 4,250 mi sw of Oslo
|
RE: Did the new selection system help mid majors?
(03-12-2018 09:18 AM)The Cutter of Bish Wrote: If one is to believe the NIT's top seeds are the First 4 Out, I'd say the system definitely isn't for the non-majors. The top 4 lines and their RPI's are:
1
Notre Dame (70)
USC (34)
St. Mary's (40)
Baylor (68)
2
Marquette (58)
Oklahoma State (88)
Louisville (ouch) (38)
Utah (59)
3
Oregon (72)
Stanford (86)
MTSU (33)
LSU (94)
4
Penn State (77)
Boise St. (50)
Western Kentucky (39)
Mississippi State (73)
So, for Vermont, Louisiana, BYU, and Rider...your RPI means nothing in even getting the gift of hosting a NIT game. Northeastern, Toledo, UCF and Old Dominion didn't get ****. Compare that to UGA and Colorado getting overlooked, but, there even, too, you're overlooking Belmont.
Texas A&M and Alabama got into the NCAAs with worse records than Mississippi State who finished 22-11. 'Bama was 8-10 in conference play. MS ST & A&M were both 9-9 in conference. Supposedly, the RPI defined the differences. Still, a 4th seed in the NIT looks low for the Bulldogs. MS ST wasn't considered a bubble team for the NCAAs either.
Penn State is another that seems NIT low, given their season wins over OSU who did comfortably squeeze into the NCAAs.
(This post was last modified: 03-12-2018 11:59 AM by OdinFrigg.)
|
|
03-12-2018 11:54 AM |
|