(12-20-2017 08:21 PM)EarthBoundMisfit Wrote:  

(12-20-2017 07:45 PM)panama Wrote:  

(12-20-2017 06:20 PM)EarthBoundMisfit Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 11:26 PM)panama Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 11:04 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  $22M+

Lol

Lol

Lol

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

you can type all the stupid ish you want.
The fact of the matter is..even if we get 6-7 million for each school in the new tv contract...its still better than the rest of the G4 leagues. Better than your conference and others like CUSA or the MAC where each school either splits $100,000 a piece, or $200,000 a piece or so...as opposed to $6-7 million (and that is guessing on the low end...it could be as high as $10 million per school from what they have put out there.)
That would keep the AAC on the competitive field with the power schools a lot longer than the other leagues.
Many will choose either to reorganize...start new conferences, merge 2 or more conferences to form a super league, or drop to a lower division of football.

So laugh out loud all you will. In your heart of hearts, you know we're right. And your conferences are green with envy.

So you would be the best paid G5

B12 would still make five times what you would make under your scenario.

Also you seem mad. You should act more like Knightime and Bearcats1 and have fun.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

it doesn't matter what the Big12 would make. The AAC would still be in the field of competition...moreso than the other leagues. Leading to better recruiting, the ability to pay for better head coaches.
The ultimate tweener league..until the next round of expansion, which will happen.
As for being happy...I'm one smiling mofo. I just don't put up with argumentative bs without the facts to back it up.

So the "fact" as you state it is that the AAC would be the "ultimate tweener" conference and not a power connference.

I'm done with this witness

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk