(12-12-2017 04:59 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  WKU was below the line. They made up ground after week 14. Sorry....

Line up Toledo with FAU
UNT with CMU
UAB with NIU
FIU with OU
and whoever you want with Akron, UB, and WMU.

CUSA would go ofer.

First, the current Massey composite is from December 2nd. WKU's ranking dropped to its current position with its loss to FIU in their final regular season game. And it wasn't a small margin. It was 41-17. They were never below the line. They did not make up ground. They lost ground. When is the last time you supposedly checked Massey? You can't just claim something as true when it's clearly not.

Second, you claimed "teams" were in the bottom 30. Which others (other than WKU) were supposedly below the line?

Third, CUSA has 3* bottom 10 teams. Not 4. This is already something I've discussed at length. You can read my previous posts. (See: MAC has 3 bottom 15 teams.) I don't know why we're having a pissing contest with the bottom of the barrel?

Fourth, when you're trying to show how one thing is inferior to another, you don't point out similarities: "1 top 50 team."

Fifth, CUSA has two more teams in its conference than MAC. Of course we're going to have more middle-of-the-road teams than you. That's why you'll see more teams ranked near the middle-bottom.

Finally, please bring your own points into this conversation. We've already talked about Ball State/UAB and Buffalo/Florida Atlantic at length. As George pointed out, Ball State was a different team at the beginning of their season. You can tell by how they played against Illinois. As I pointed out, so were Florida Atlantic. How did Buffalo almost beat second-ranked Northern Illinois and BEAT third-ranked Ohio? How did Ohio BEAT Toledo into the ground 38-10 but lose to Buffalo? I only ask since you're so fixated on single losses.

x