The unofficial online home for fans of the Old Dominion University Monarchs. Part of Collegiate Sports Nation (CSN).

(11-14-2017 01:09 PM)T-Mac Wrote:  

(11-14-2017 12:42 PM)Fatalisk Wrote:  It's really not worth talking about. Talley would have found the floor, we would have had more depth, talent, and production.

He's gone, but it's uninformed to argue we're better without him.

If he played 100% of his minutes at the 3, there's a valid argument that we're better off without him. I don't think anyone is making the argument that we're better off without him if he played significant minutes at the 4 (which he definitely would have this year).

(11-14-2017 01:16 PM)Monarchblue Wrote:  

(11-14-2017 12:42 PM)Fatalisk Wrote:  It's really not worth talking about. Talley would have found the floor, we would have had more depth, talent, and production.

He's gone, but it's uninformed to argue we're better without him.

No. It's not. He would be playing, and that would hurt us offensively, unless he was playing the 4, which JJ has proven he would not do with regularity.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

I disagree with that, but for the sake of argument, if Caver was mandated to play 100% of his minutes at 5 we'd be better off without him. Why are we discussing nonsense?

We are better with Talley on the roster, that's why he was on scholarship.