Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Santa v. Graham
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
badmoonrising13 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,943
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation: 6
I Root For: NIU
Location:
Post: #30
RE: Santa v. Graham
(09-10-2017 11:48 AM)Rabid Squirrel Wrote:  
(09-10-2017 11:34 AM)7 Wrote:  
(09-10-2017 11:29 AM)Rabid Squirrel Wrote:  
(09-10-2017 12:17 AM)Teamduh Wrote:  
(09-09-2017 08:15 PM)Rabid Squirrel Wrote:  Its more about the passes he made. A couple of big time throws. To Tears and Brown. Graham rarely makes those. Santa seems to have a knack for it, though limited evidence. An analogy would be Graham is Bouagnon and Santa is Huff. It's about the upside. The playmaking, game changing ability.
I fail to see the analogy. Huff is splitting time with Jones instead of being the main man like Joel last year.

I agree, the accurate deep passes for Santa were a huge improvement over last week. Let's hope he can continue this the next 2 weeks. Then we can compare the qbs.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

I use the Bouagnon/Huff analogy just because it fits the Fundementals over upside argument that Carey follows. He will always take the practical - do it right in practice - limit mistakes - over the home run hitter who maybe Has a few lapses mentally. Carey is a Graham/Bouagnon type guy.
You're not wrong, but don't you think the vast majority of coaches would play the guy who looks better in practice?

Santa def has some "gamer" to him. May just be one of those guys who plays better than he practices.

It would depend how bad Huff or Santa looked in practice. I get the Graham thing a little more. At least coming into BC. But at this point I think Santa has shown enough that Carey needs to forget about what happens in practice and game plan around Santa. And that's what bugs me about Carey.....just my own speculation, but Carey strikes me as - do it my way or no way. If you have to deviate from what you want to do offensively to fit the QB, do it. Maybe he is. IDK.

Unless Huff was just a complete moron during practice, I don't know why he didn't see 75% of the carries last year and this year. All I can conclude is Carey emphasis his philosophy over performance. A coach does need to have his philosophy and personality imprint on the team, but there is a point of bending it. And for me it's at a career 7 yds per carry.

Carey is proving year after year what a horrible coach he is. McIntosh over Hare and Maddie. Bouagnon over Huff. Graham over Maddie. Graham over Santa. Jones over Huff. The guy is an idiot.
09-10-2017 01:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Santa v. Graham - NILAW - 09-09-2017, 07:28 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - MaddDawgz02 - 09-09-2017, 07:35 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - foch41 - 09-10-2017, 07:24 AM
RE: Santa v. Graham - 7 - 09-09-2017, 07:42 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - Rabid Squirrel - 09-09-2017, 08:15 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - NIU007 - 09-09-2017, 08:09 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - 142niu - 09-09-2017, 08:14 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - MaddDawgz02 - 09-10-2017, 12:25 AM
RE: Santa v. Graham - NIUHuskie4life - 09-09-2017, 08:45 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - NIU1981 - 09-09-2017, 09:02 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - armour248 - 09-09-2017, 09:07 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - HuskiePride12 - 09-09-2017, 09:08 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - Homewood Huskie - 09-09-2017, 09:09 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - badmoonrising13 - 09-09-2017, 09:44 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - NIU84 - 09-09-2017, 10:47 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - 7huskie6 - 09-09-2017, 11:09 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - NIU1981 - 09-09-2017, 11:45 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - Teamduh - 09-10-2017, 12:17 AM
RE: Santa v. Graham - Rabid Squirrel - 09-10-2017, 11:29 AM
RE: Santa v. Graham - 7 - 09-10-2017, 11:34 AM
RE: Santa v. Graham - Rabid Squirrel - 09-10-2017, 11:48 AM
RE: Santa v. Graham - badmoonrising13 - 09-10-2017 01:32 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - Djud - 09-10-2017, 01:34 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - 17Huskies - 09-10-2017, 11:14 AM
RE: Santa v. Graham - Djud - 09-10-2017, 11:21 AM
RE: Santa v. Graham - 17Huskies - 09-10-2017, 11:25 AM
RE: Santa v. Graham - uiniu57 - 09-10-2017, 11:26 AM
RE: Santa v. Graham - 7 - 09-10-2017, 11:35 AM
RE: Santa v. Graham - uiniu57 - 09-10-2017, 03:51 PM
Santa v. Graham - NIU32 - 09-10-2017, 11:48 AM
RE: Santa v. Graham - 17Huskies - 09-10-2017, 12:54 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - NIUSAE - 09-10-2017, 01:12 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - Teamduh - 09-10-2017, 10:46 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - MaddDawgz02 - 09-11-2017, 12:12 AM
RE: Santa v. Graham - shack66 - 09-11-2017, 02:02 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - MaddDawgz02 - 09-11-2017, 02:14 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - NIU007 - 09-11-2017, 08:04 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - MaddDawgz02 - 09-11-2017, 08:07 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - NIU007 - 09-11-2017, 08:09 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - MaddDawgz02 - 09-11-2017, 02:40 PM
RE: Santa v. Graham - NIU007 - 09-11-2017, 08:01 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.