(03-17-2017 06:49 PM)nzmorange Wrote:  Statistics disagrees.

Not if you're comparing apples to watermelons!

You're trying to present a watermelon as an apple.

(03-17-2017 06:54 PM)nzmorange Wrote:  the Big XII <or honestly, instert pretty much any large conference here> has stronger academics than Harvard because the Big XII conference produces more <insert top level people here> than Harvard.

Critical flaw exposed:

that Harvard, Wake Forest, etc don't have the most CFO's, does not prove that those schools have inferior academics.


You're trying to start from an assumption, that Harvard has the best academics, and then build an argument that points to that assumption.

The entirely wrong way to make a logical argument!