(01-11-2017 03:03 PM)JCGSU Wrote:  

(01-11-2017 01:19 PM)rokamortis Wrote:  

(01-11-2017 12:14 PM)JCGSU Wrote:  

(01-11-2017 12:05 PM)rokamortis Wrote:  

(01-11-2017 11:30 AM)JCGSU Wrote:  Ladies and Gentlemen I present to you consistency

Hey, I didn't realize you have some sort of man-crush on Chadwell - my bad - be a dismissive dikwad if you want.

If you want to trust your program to him then so be it - I wouldn't want him anywhere near my program. A coach that does the bare minimum with APR to hold onto the lowest possible APR score he can have without incurring penalties may be fine for you guys. All praise Chadwell!!!

Sure, some coaches take a risk here and there - others try to base their career on it. Again, I don't think it is a good strategy but if you guys like it then you should have hired him. Obviously there are no red flags to hiring Chadwell, you guys just whiffed on him. oops.


Not so much, but consistent with the new spin. Good luck rehabilitating the low life! You guys are just wonderful giving him a "second chance". I am still trying to reconcile all your HC remarks about Chadwell and yours because they were complete opposites. All good, can you keep us up to date on his rehabilitation and how he is progressing to meet the high CCU standard from the lowly days at CSU?

I'm sure you also found during your exhaustive research where I said I wouldn't have hired him. But it is what it is - can't do anything about it. Hopefully he works out well for us.

Back peddling like a mofo

It literally took about tens seconds, you click on a person's name and click posts. You should familiarize yourself with board functions...

I dont know for a guy you dont want "anywhere near" your program it seems pretty risky....good chance he brings down the whole program.....good luck.

You should familiarize yourself with sarcasm.

You should familiarize yourself on the meaning of consistent or hypocrite. One your are not and the other you are just for a little help.

And you should learn a little about relevance. The whole premise of both your and Roks statements center around HC discussion. Which he's not. He has gone out of his way to remove any HCIW speculation, and Joe has done likewise. So really, as stated, concerns about him are greatly mitigated. We know who our HC is, and what will fly in his program. If Joe dies tomorrow, and after a coach search JC is becoming our HC, then you can bring this whole bag of worthlessness back up. Not the same scenario. And not one I believe our school would've entertained as a direct to HC like some of you were.

HC, too many questions.

OC, with a an Assoc HC based on past positions, no worries. Can you move on now?