The WikiLeaks revelations brings to mind the old saying that a comedian is only as good as her material. There never would have been a problem if the e-mails hadn't revealed that the Democratic Party was not being democratic in conspiring to give its nomination to Clinton, or one of the party operatives was feeding debate questions to the Clinton campaign, or that there were supposedly-objective journalists actively working to help the campaign, among other revelations. It begs the question of how anyone could consider such a party and such a campaign suitable to govern, given the contempt shown towards the process and the ethical boundaries being skirted.

In terms of the report from the Directorate of National Intelligence, as noted it's a lot of speculation with little evidence. The head of WikiLeaks Julian Assange has stated that the leaked e-mails weren't provided by Russia, and Occam's Razor demands that his explanation is the most likely one.