(03-10-2013 08:40 PM)billings Wrote:  

(03-10-2013 08:19 PM)Tallgrass Wrote:  

(03-10-2013 07:59 PM)Knightsweat Wrote:  

(03-10-2013 07:39 PM)goldenhurricane2 Wrote:  

(03-10-2013 06:27 PM)Tallgrass Wrote:  CUSA is not a shadow of itself as claimed above; Nbe/A12 certainly is though.

Nbe also has teams it wouldn't touch a couple years ago. But CUSA did a better job with its additions than Nbe did with its.

Let me get this straight - according to Tallgrass:

North Texas, ODU, UNCC, F_Us and UTSA are better than Houston, SMU, Memphis, UCF, ECU and Tulsa?

Do you really believe this???

He's a Troll. Ignore him

When you claim you will obtain AQ status, get a humoungous tv football contact but end up with a measley $1.8M, lose Madison Square Garden, and Navy reconsiders, I think your dog won't hunt.

UTSA will match/outdraw Houston, UNT will match/outdraw SMU, La Tech beats BCS teams while Tulane sucks, Middle Tennessee has made a living beating Memphis, and ODU will draw 35,000 while Temple is concerned week nite games will decrease attendance and wipe out the measley Nbe/C12 tv contract. FIU and FAU are projects; but I am glad they were there for CUSA.

Please also remember UConn and Cincy are 0-3 in BCS bowls and got waxed in all three BCS bowls.

As for ALL NonAQ teams, it is beating BCS teams in nonconfernece games that determine status; lose to those teams and your confernce don't make a ding dong.

Nah. But you are right that UTSA will outdraw most of the BE

They very well may - but know one knows yet. It'll be interesting to see how things go when they stop giving away free tickets and their novelty status wears off.