(02-23-2012 10:59 AM)NJRedMan Wrote:  This is just dribble. You lost all credibility when you said that's it's bad for the big east after losing 3-4 BBall powers to add 2 more. Really? So they are better off just losing 3-4 teams and doing nothing?

A BBall player choses Marquette over Wisconsin and has to worry about a chick asking if he plays FB?

A BBall player won't want to play BBall in the big east because of the FB reputation? You do know that every kid in the country knows the big east is the best BBall league right?

I couldn't even get to the end of this post because it made no sense.

Not that adding 2 more is a bad idea. Just that 2 is not as many as 3-4.

Baller goes to Wisconsin, chick is going to assume he plays FB. REcruits are 16-17 year old kids.

After the additions and subtractions, Big East won't be "the best league". The league with Syracuse and Georgetown and Louisville and UConn is the best b-ball league in the nation. But that league won't be there.

The new Big East will be one of 4-5-6 good leagues, but no better than the SEC or Big 12 or Big 10 in hoops.