(01-08-2026 02:50 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(01-08-2026 02:39 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(01-08-2026 02:26 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  If the front tires (front wheel drive) didn't slip when she pressed the gas to go forward, the officer would have been under the car. That is the only thing that saved him and gave him time to draw his weapon and only get bumped by the front corner.

Exactly what Jonathan Turley just said. He also repeated that intent doesn't matter, once she refused to get out of the car, rolled up her window with another officer's arm in the window (who barely got his arm out in time), backed the car up, turned the wheels, hit the accelerator (you can see a tire spin in some of the videos), and hit the officer who then fired at her.

She obviously committed an act that justified his firing at her to protect himself. Committed an act. Not something done without intent. She demonstrated intent. To disobey a lawful order and flee.

And hit the federal agent in the process, too. But certain people still say "she dih-un do nuffin" despite all the video evidence. Even good-hearted but misguided folks have bought into the leftist narrative that Good did nothing wrong.

Yes, I mentioned that in the first paragraph. Did you want me to repeat it in the second paragraph? :)