Hello There, Guest! Registered users see far less ads! Register today and join our virtual tailgate. (Login — Register)

Post Reply 
My gripe with MiLB’s International League
Author Message
Fighting Muskie Offline
Senior Chief Realignmentologist
*

Posts: 15,050
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 1214
I Root For: Bishop Sycamore
Location: Secret Lair
Post: #7
RE: My gripe with MiLB’s International League
(12-04-2025 01:54 PM)eku05 Wrote:  
(11-24-2025 05:15 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote:  I have to say that 20 teams is way too large for a minor league circuit. The methodology for determining a champion is absolutely asinine. First half champ vs second half champion is dumb. Where else in American sports do we reward teams for half a season’s work?

This segues into my next point—your schedules can’t possibly be balanced when playing so few games. The IL breaks down standings in “East” and “West” divisions but that’s a complete joke. Some division mates never even play. In reality, there are 3 shadow divisions—6 northeastern teams, 7 southern teams, and 7 Midwest teams (congrats Louisville, you’re honorary Midwesterners).

So why not do this—actually have those be the 3 divisions! Do a tiny post season playoff with the 3 division champs and a wildcard.

I get that the parent clubs are anxious to get their 40-man roster guys for the final push but don’t treat the minor league fans like we’re dumb with a bogus postseason model.

I don't like the methodology either, but the first half/second half thing has been the case for years in A and AA. It's only new to AAA. The argument for it is that MiLB rosters evolve so much over the course of a year that there is some level of sense in rewarding teams for separate halves of the season often played with dramatically different rosters. There's a lot I'd change about how MiLB seasons work.

But as a side now, as a Louisville native and resident, plenty of us identify with the midwest regionally as much as anything else. Louisville is a bit of a regional crossroads, but I definitely don't think of myself as a southerner.

But if AAA team #1 wins the first half by 1 game, then proceeds to lose a bunch of players to trades and call ups and is pitiful in the 2nd half, letting them participate in the title game is a joke. I’d rather award teams for a full body of work.

I just hate the apples to oranges comparisons— they aren’t even playing the same teams. Some of these principles work ok in an 8-12 game circuit where the scheduling is balanced, but it doesn’t work with 20 teams.

Louisville has played with Indianapolis, Columbus, and Toledo for some time now— I get why they grouped them with the 6 Midwestern teams rather than the 8 Southern teams—now there’s an idea—spin off the 8 Southern teams as their own AAA league and the IL becomes a 6 Northeast/6 Midwest team circuit.
12-04-2025 04:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: My gripe with MiLB’s International League - Fighting Muskie - 12-04-2025 04:41 PM



User(s) browsing this thread:


Copyright © 2002-2026 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group.