(09-11-2025 01:17 PM)Claw Wrote:  

(09-11-2025 01:08 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(09-11-2025 01:07 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(09-11-2025 12:51 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(09-11-2025 12:42 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

So to recap, you use parts of the Bible to justify your political views, yet reject the Bible and Christian ethics as a whole, and prefer Christians to rule as secularists.

Do I have this correct?

where did i say i rejected the bible? and yes, I prefer Christians to GOVERN as secularists.

I hope we don't have a ruler here.

So these Christians who don’t vote for expanded social programs are ruling as secularists, putting aside their faith which demands we take care of the poor.

They’re doing what you want.

Christians don't covet another's property. What gives a Christian the right to take your property and give it to the needy? Nothing. That's what social programs do, and they are not inherently Christian.

I know all of this…

I’m demonstrating the logical fallacy that this guy keeps engaging in. He’s quite literally just as hypocritical than the “hypocritical Christians” that he’s trying to dunk on.