(11-15-2019 07:34 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(11-14-2019 10:50 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(11-14-2019 05:51 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(11-14-2019 04:25 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(11-14-2019 04:19 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  OO, be careful before you breathlessly post false equivalencies.

Trump/Russia - leak of stolen emails.

These emails - not stolen.


https://www.newsweek.com/stephen-miller-...io-1471830

I didn't use the word "stolen", did I?

the emails are leaked, period.

But according to the Democratic double standard, it doesn't matter.

It's like saying revenge porn is OK because the videos were sent voluntarily.

Gotta give you credit for this pretzel, it is a master piece.

No pretzel, just straightforward thinking.

Once you eliminate the "stolen" part that you imagined(and that you claimed made the difference), it is a clear 1:1.

But connecting imaginary dots seems to be a democratic art form the last four years. Adam Schiff is a Master (or is that a Magister?) at it.

Once you ignore the crime that was proven to have been committed? Really?

Really, rich, a Democrat whining about a crime being ignored.

Yes, Virginia, too bad somebody stole those emails. But the person revealing them was not the thief. Trump was not the thief, nor was he in collusion to steal them. So, ...? In both cases people had their private communications made public against their will. Seems like a parallel to me. Exactly like revenge porn, which apparently you think is OK if one party decides to take them public.