(08-06-2018 04:46 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-06-2018 04:43 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-06-2018 04:09 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(08-06-2018 01:04 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-06-2018 12:59 PM)thespiritof1976 Wrote:  INFOWARS has become the first book to be burned by the media's FAHRENHEIT 451 order.

Again, you are welcome to raise 20 billion bucks to build a duplicative ISP network and spend an equal amount to build and promote video sharing and social networking platforms. Its a free market right? No one is banning his speech, they're simply refusing to promote it on their platforms.

Seriously though, he'll just move his schtick over to OAN and RT. They just don't have the viewers and members and his speech will be further marginalized. You wont be able to share his garbage on fb or on your youtube channel.

Don't Alex Jones supporters have some sort of video networking platform?

the concern here is how a public service like the internet can be controlled by private policy rather than by constitutional access.

that's the crux!

and how you legislate that should be fairly simple with existing law and decisions....

we don't need more laws....we either need revisions to existing and/or SCOTUS intervention.....

Guys, so youre saying that a private company should be forced to promote speech that it disagrees with? Good, I'm looking forward to selling a line of abortion pills on the Hobby Lobby site or having CBN and Lifesite promote my political videos.

Guys, you are tying yourselves in knots here.

Actually, no.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.