Credit to Shapiro (who is no fan of Jones) for stepping up and being heard on this issue.

Quote:First, the caveats: these are all private companies, and their termination of Jones’ accounts isn’t a legal violation of the First Amendment.

But it is a problem. It’s a problem because these policies are extraordinarily vague. These policies aren’t merely designed to crack down on speech openly advocating or threatening violence, or containing obscenity. These policies are deliberately unclear as well as political.

What, for example, constitutes “hate speech”? Much of what Jones and his employees say is absolutely rotten pig excrement, but there’s no definition of hate speech that has a limiting principle. Is it “using dehumanizing language to describe people who are transgender” to state that transgender people suffer from a mental disorder? Or that they are not in fact members of the gender to which they claim membership? What constitutes “hate speech” when discussing the relationship between radical Islam and terrorism? None of this has been made clear.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/34101/fac...en-shapiro