(06-26-2018 03:53 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(06-23-2018 06:59 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(06-23-2018 03:22 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  If bakers don't have to bake cakes...

Why dont you try to actually read what the ruling was instead of letting someone else tell you. Tell you incorrectly at that.

Think for yourself and if you are, then stop being a f'ing idiot.

Did or did not the SCOTUS rule the baker did not have make the cakes. While it was a very narrow decision in its scope they still ruled that way. Stop being a f’ing hypocrite.

It did not so rule. It ruled that the requested decoration -- celebrating a gay marriage -- was a form of expression, and that the First Amendment bars gov't from compelling citizens to speak against their beliefs.

The baker was perfectly willing to sell these litigious customers a cake. He was unwilling to be forced to celebrate something that, in his belief system, is a sin. [For the record, I'd have happily decorated the cake.]

The disgraceful owner of the Red Hen was not being forced to sing the praises of president Trump. She was only being asked to serve a willing customer -- one who had done her no harm other than to think differently than she.

And the restaurant owner is not now facing fines or closure from the gov't.

Xcentricty should not equate to stupidity. Do better.