(12-29-2017 06:27 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(12-29-2017 05:21 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-29-2017 05:16 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  There’s nothing to be called out on.

I think you dolts just like saying dossier because it sounds mysterious.

I guess Strzok didnt get canned. I guess Comey didnt get canned. I guess McCabe 'retiring' is just coincidence. I guess the FBI General Counsel being 'retired in a lateral move' is also just coincidence.

But bad form to call out the stories that seem to link all four of these people. And their spouses. Got it..... double bad for Trump to state the fact that the FBI went balls deep politically.

But please whine some more Mensa.

1. Strzok was removed from the case once his texts were discovered. That being said, there is absolutely nothing saying an agent has to be apolitical. Trump's attorney, Ty Cobb, donated money on several occassions to Hillary Clinton.
2. Trump firing Comey is why there is a special counsel, in the first place.
3. McCabe should have stayed on, but I'm sure he announced his retirement to take any focus off of him.


That being said, I'd rather be on the defensive side of a man with the integrity of Robert Mueller than trying to defend a charlatan like Donald Trump.

Post their resumes of service side by side... I'm sorry but questioning Mueller's integrity while defending a habitual liar like Trump is beyond sane, yet thats politics.

All that being said, Mueller may determine there's nothing there... but I know I'll trust his findings once he reaches them.

Another strawman. I guess asking 'where is the collusion' is now *defending* Trump. So asking for evidence of your witch hunt is now "defending". Got it....

As for 2, that is incorrect. Perhaps you should actually read the documents setting up the Special Counsel and the authority granted. Nowhere does it read "because Comey was fired". I read the term "to investigate Russia" or somefink. Stop pulling stuff out of your ass to suit your reason du jour.

But, please conflate *everything* with *everything* else. You seem to excel at that obfuscation.

As for 3, if McCabe did nothing wrong, no reason to retire. But lets look at his actions in place below.

And you utterly ignore the General Counsel being 'retired in place'.

So lets look at the FBI scorecard:

Agent in charge of the Hillary whitewash and deeply involved with the Trump Special Counsel investigation not just makes biased emails, but shines a light into the generation of an "insurance policy" on the election.

McCabe, is identified as the person in whoms office Strzoh makes the comments about the insurance policy in. McCabe and Strzoh are both identified as editing Comey's comments about Hillary's email and changing the language in the original from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless". It just so happens that a portion of the US Code that identifies charges of mishandling classified information just happens to have the actions described as being illegal when done in a "grossly negligent" manner.

Comey, who assigned Strzoh to the whitewashed Clinton investigation and later to the Trump investigation himself leaks FBI information after he is canned to make himself smell better.

And strangely enough, the General Counsel, who is now known to be a subject of an investigation by the FBI Inspector General, doesnt retire, but is 'transferred' to the effective version of FBI legal Siberia.

So how do those resumes look to you Mensa? Something you are proud of?

The top of the FBI leadership planted themselves fing neck deep in political activity. But Trump is a 'bad boy' for having the temerity to call the crap described out. Love that view there, Mensa......