(12-17-2017 01:34 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  fwiw, former DOJ attorney, Driscoll just backed ol' blue's position in a non specific manner on Fox....

that's what lawyers do when in the soap box of the boob tube....or those on a bbs

Some of them are incorrectly believing that because the transition occurs on government email and devices, they are the same as government records. They are not. They are presidential records. There's an entirely different standard applied to them. And they have separate rights associated with them.

We know Muehller didnt subpoena the records. Therefore he would have had to go through the process of a court of appropriate jurisdiction OR simply relied upon Clinton Cronies at the GSA to hand them over. If he didnt go through the court, he was wrong. If he did go through the court, we simply need to know what basis there was given to get the records (dossier related) or what judge they used. (Was it the guy that just recused himself because he was also the FISA judge that signed off on the fake dossier based wiretaps)

Its one of the two prior two methods. And Muehller doesnt seem to want to be very transparent in which method it was. Sad. But taint boy knows it wont be good if it gets out.