(12-05-2017 04:24 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 04:16 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 04:07 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 03:45 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 02:47 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

So now simply praising anyone who disagrees with Trump means you're "irredeemably compromised"?

Jesus Christ, this is downright scary that you guys aren't seeing this for what it transparently is; a concerted effort to discredit any investigation into Trump by labeling anyone but the most transparent sycophants "compromised". Everyone here, including those of you who support Trump, have almost assuredly have made comments criticizing something he's done. Simply sending texts saying you disagree with the guy or agree with someone who's opposed to him isn't evidence of a falsification of evidence or proof the entire investigation is a partisan hackjob. Mueller is a lifelong republican, a f*cking veteran, and has spent his life serving our nation with integrity, but Trump complains about him and instantly none of that matters because he's compromised?

How many of his staff have been revealed to be Trump cheerleaders?

No idea, but it shouldn't matter on either end. The facts will rest on their merits, and unless you find that evidence was falsified or laws broken, you can't design an investigatory team based on their loyalty to the accused. I find it hard to believe I'm having to explain this to other Americans, but, here we are.

After two terms, socialism has taken its toll in DC. That, and greed.