(12-04-2017 03:47 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 03:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 03:30 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 02:58 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 01:17 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

It's too easy. Not even sporting anymore to expose his false statements. He just lays then out there on a silver platter.

I mean even the little retard kid who lives next to my uncle eventually learned not to piss on the electric fence. UCF just keep walking up and whizzing away. Either stupid or a sado-masochist. Maybe both.

Where is the evidence that I was wrong? Gowdy had no evidence that it was Mueller, plenty of other people are involved with Grand Juries, why are we talking about it as if we know it was him or his team?

If you have actual evidence, provide it. If not, want to retract that statement?

Evidence that the Mueller team has leaks? Let's go back to the June 15 Washington Post.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat...7354adbcf5

Quote:The special counsel overseeing the investigation into Russia’s role in the 2016 election is interviewing senior intelligence officials as part of a widening probe that now includes an examination of whether President Trump attempted to obstruct justice, officials said.

The move by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III to investigate Trump’s conduct marks a major turning point in the nearly year-old FBI investigation, which until recently focused on Russian meddling during the presidential campaign and on whether there was any coordination between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin. Investigators have also been looking for any evidence of possible financial crimes among Trump associates, officials said.

Quote:Five people briefed on the interview requests, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly, said that Daniel Coats, the current director of national intelligence, Mike Rogers, head of the National Security Agency, and Rogers’s recently departed deputy, Richard Ledgett, agreed to be interviewed by Mueller’s investigators as early as this week. The investigation has been cloaked in secrecy, and it is unclear how many others have been questioned by the FBI.

This was long before the grand just was seated.

So, again, the leak occurred when the investigation involved others people outside of the investigation. Could have been Muellers team, but then why aren't there any leaks when no one else is involved?

The only people who should have known the subjects of a supposed secret investigation at that point are:
A. The investigative team

and

B. The subjects themselves

And B. wouldn't know of anyone's involvement but their own. Anyone else having knowledge of the investigation had to have gotten it from either A or B, and wouldn't have got the entire story from B. as printed.

You don't need involvement from any outside entity to do interviews. Just your team, the subject you want to interview, and their legal counsel.

Them's the facts.