(12-04-2017 09:48 AM)EagleX Wrote:  

(12-03-2017 10:13 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 04:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 03:14 PM)Dasville Wrote:  A text is a private conversation. Wonder who he was texting and how Mueller found out?

He didnt. The IG did.

You really are dumb.

So are you guys upset Mueller did the ethical thing and fired him. Or are you mad that the investigation is based on facts?

liberals can never answer this question; "without using the meaningless word, "collusion", what, exactly, do you think you're going to find?".

listen to the answer. it invariably translates to "nothing".

they don't even know what they're looking for.

Obstruction of justice looks like the big one right now for obvious reasons, but outside of that, I'd imagine Trumps books aren't nearly as clean as they should be so wouldn't be surprised at some sort of financial fraud.

That being said, your entire point is pretty silly tbh. Despite "collusion" itself not being a crime, there are plenty of crimes which could be described colloquially as collusion, like accepting foreign assistance during the campaign with the promise of repealing sanctions for instance. Lying to investigators to cover that up. Using funds known to have originate from foreign sources. etc/etc. But the point of an investigation is to, you know, investigate, so arguing that we don't know exactly what will be found is patently idiotic.