(11-28-2017 02:15 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 02:09 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Now back to your policy changes. It sounds like a lot of time and effort. Are you sure that all of this could be done without changing one single law?

I ask because we are talking about the death of one agent and you have a big plan to stop it.

But when it comes to mass shootings, you don't want to move a finger.

I find that ironic.

Mass shootings are not a threat to national security. An unsecured border is.

And I never said anything about changing one law. I have no problem with changing laws that do not work, especially when it doesn't involve the rights of American citizens.

I'm just trying to find consistency here.

The death of one Border agent is a matter of national security but the mass shooting of hundreds of innocent Americans is not?

How do you figure?