(11-23-2017 02:55 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-23-2017 01:48 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-23-2017 01:38 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-23-2017 01:11 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-23-2017 12:58 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  No it wasn't, it was nothing but meaningless rhetoric claiming a risk of technological stagnation backed by no quantitative evidence supporting such claim. Only a simpleton whose political identity aligns with these vague ideals would find this argument compelling.

you just came a whole lot of the same rhetoric......you fit right in with the dems.....

what you're smart enough to know is that censoring is your last across the bow be-al-gore is sunk....

we're just sitting on the sidelines eating popcorn with floss.....

Stink, read the posts before you comment on them, then maybe you'll grasp why I don't need to provide quantitative evidence or source data to criticise someone affirmatively making a claim without either providing either of those.

you know what.....I'll concede that one (I read 'em all....it makes me laugh)

however, why come with gibberish when you have the potential to make light of .....or am I overstating what I see in ability???

I know you're no dummy.....you simply display the symptoms of another troll....that's a waste of ability IMO....

Truth is I'm not really in a position to easily provide evidence contrary to his claim right now being on my phone, but I still wanted to outline how ridiculous it is for a statement like that to be considered compelling.

lol......ze phone........how I hate thee......I can't wait for the prosthetic neck bracing to evolve for those that lean for-back-ward...

sometimes I post in field.....but it's rare for that reason alone.....