(11-23-2017 01:11 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-23-2017 12:58 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-23-2017 12:37 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(11-21-2017 10:11 PM)Claw Wrote:  We've already seen this.

We had 50 years of zero innovation under the AT&T phone monopoly. Within years of that breakup we went from 300 baud modems and fax machines to high speed modems and on to the Internet.

If you make the Internet a utility, it stops right where it is. It will never get any better. Ask the people in Michigan how good their water utility services are.

We are no where near the point where freezing the technologies used to deliver net services is a good idea.

Let the market work. All you guys that are worried about having your speed tampered with just buy from people who don't do that. That's how free markets work.

Thank you, well said.

No it wasn't, it was nothing but meaningless rhetoric claiming a risk of technological stagnation backed by no quantitative evidence supporting such claim. Only a simpleton whose political identity aligns with these vague ideals would find this argument compelling.

you just came a whole lot of the same rhetoric......you fit right in with the dems.....

what you're smart enough to know is that censoring is your last across the bow be-al-gore is sunk....

we're just sitting on the sidelines eating popcorn with floss.....

Stink, read the posts before you comment on them, then maybe you'll grasp why I don't need to provide quantitative evidence or source data to criticise someone affirmatively making a claim without either providing either of those.