(12-20-2016 02:13 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(12-20-2016 01:37 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(12-20-2016 01:00 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(12-20-2016 12:03 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(12-20-2016 11:47 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Yet your first comment to the issue is
So you bold the comment about the "complaining", and now try to dive back to the "thats a big jump" line. Would you care to explain your absolute first comment to the issue then?

Yes Ralph broke the law, Then why do you start the issue off with essentially "When do we call Fred out as Ralph's buddy and pal in the mess."

If Fred was in cahoots, yep, Fred needs to pay the piper. If Fred wasn't a "conspirator" then the inflammatory first statement you led the thread off with is just that -- inflammatory and gratuitously snarky.

Further, the fact that the DNC server was hacked in an amazingly stupid way...... I'll just let that lie.

Additionally, you have to remember that nothing in that hacked emails has been disavowed. Nothing. So the problem with the effect of the emails ultimately rests with the people that "put that to paper", so to speak. You are mad that someone revealed truthful and accurate items.

And if and when RNC emails are released, I will have no sympathy for the results to the authors.

It is like a legal proceeding when one party shows evidence from phones and emails of the opponent detailing the opponent saying or doing (insert your bad behavior of choice here) Invariably the jerkball who now has been depantsed always says "how DARE you look at the email....". I mean they are more outraged at the fact that they are evidenced being (xyz) than the fact that they themselves provided that fodder.

Not mad at all and never stated I was.

Sorry, then. But a lot of people are upset that these emails were revealed. The problem is not that they were revealed, but that they were not taken care of sufficiently to not be stolen.

A good example is the dump of classified emails on Weiner's computer, a computer not authorized to have them. A lot of people are mad at the FBI for investigating this, when they should be mad about the lax manner of handling them.

If you are not one of the "lots" of people, I apologize.

To bold, what? When was it shown that Weiner's computer has classified emails on them? Please cite the source, because all of the reports I saw were just that there had been emails relating to the Clinton investigation, and not classified emails. Two very different things.''

edit: regardless, most people weren't mad at the FBI for investigating the emails, it was for how they handled the investigation and telling the public, since the news ended up coming back that the emails were all duplicates of those already investigated (e.g. not news at all).

And while some people were upset at these emails being leaked from the DNC, I'm not one of them. But I am concerned about who did it and what motives they had. It's good to get some of the dirty side of politics cleaned up, but it's not like these emails revealed vote rigging, etc.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016...-on-compu/

I read the article - where does that say these emails were on the Weiner computer?