(11-06-2016 07:07 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 07:04 PM)JustAnotherAustinOwl Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 05:46 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 05:25 PM)JustAnotherAustinOwl Wrote:  That was just the last in a long line of anti-semitism from the Trump campaign. Which is run by an anti-semite.
Some things are just plain wrong and trump (no pun intended) policy and other issues. Racism, bigotry, anti-semitism, etc. fall into that category. I could even accept someone ignoring Trump's complete lack of knowledge and experience on the basis of party/ideology.
But support a campaign which most acknowledge is one of white nationalism? Sorry, there is no way to morally defend that.

Your saying those things doesn't make them true.

Which things? That supporting racism, bigotry, and anti-semitism is morally indefensible? Fair enough, that is merely my opinion. And thankfully the opinion of most people with a sense of decency.

You know perfectly well what I mean, so this is totally disingenuous on your part.

Your saying that Trump supports those things doesn't make that true.

So you're saying Trump has not run an ant-semitic campaign? That Breitbart isn't well know as and anti-semitic and white nationalist outlet? That Steve "I won't let my children go to school with Jews" Bannon isn't an anti-semite? That Trump's latest ad, already condemned by the ADL and others doesn't draw upon classic anti-semitic tropes, and it's just a coincidence that every person it associates with Clinton happens to be Jewish. That Trump hasn't *literally* retweeted anti-semetic memes originating from neo-Nazis? That his son hasn't retweeted things with white nationalist/neo-nazi mascot "pepe the frog"? That he didn't give a speech a couple weeks ago accusing of Clinton of conspiring with "international bankers" to take away US sovereignty that sounded like a Father Coughlin speech?

These are all things that actually happened. So forgive me if I don't take the idea that he's not running an anti-Semitic campaign seriously....