(10-30-2016 09:22 PM)gsloth Wrote:  

(10-29-2016 07:47 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(10-29-2016 02:12 PM)JustAnotherAustinOwl Wrote:  

(10-29-2016 01:53 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(10-29-2016 01:04 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  If they find e-mails that were not previously disclosed, which seems to be the expectation, then she did in fact lie.

Do I understand things correctly that they did not definitely find new emails, but that they found emails from Clinton that may or may not have been disclosed before?

My understanding was that they were not from Clinton. But we don't really know, which is why normally you wouldn't release info like this. Pete Williams has been reporting that they don't actually expect anything significant that would alter the conclusion from July...

My understanding is the emails were between Hillary and Huma. I guess we won't know for sure for a couple of days.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/c...li=BBnb7Kz

Perhaps folks are forgetting that Huma Abedin had an e-mail account on the clintonemail.com server. And that she admitted to using it for State Department communication on occasion.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-secur...ree-people

Perhaps these are the e-mails in question that are showing up, with questionable content.

Too much supposition going on now (mine included). It'll be an interesting week to see what else leaks about this.

You can say that again.

At the moment, there is no evidence of anything other than there being emails involving Hillary on the computer. Yet plenty of people are trying to draw some serious conclusions from this.