Stateman
Special Teams
Posts: 525
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation: 2
I Root For: East Tennessee
Location: Georgia
|
|
02-18-2017 02:51 PM |
|
BucDoctor
All American
Posts: 2,877
Joined: May 2005
Reputation: 27
I Root For: UVa, ETSU
Location: Parts Unknown
|
RE: Liberty to FBS
Right now no conference wants Liberty because of their deep pocket ability to fund their athletic department. With 110,000 students, a small increase in the student activity/athletic fee can move their athletic department budget into the stratosphere.
|
|
02-18-2017 06:46 PM |
|
Buc66
All American
Posts: 4,140
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 21
I Root For: ETSU Bucs
Location:
|
RE: Liberty to FBS
(02-18-2017 06:46 PM)BucDoctor Wrote: Right now no conference wants Liberty because of their deep pocket ability to fund their athletic department. With 110,000 students, a small increase in the student activity/athletic fee can move their athletic department budget into the stratosphere.
Very surprising the NCAA gave them anything. They are not exactly on the right side of political correctness. Strange development.
|
|
02-18-2017 07:02 PM |
|
NewTimes
All American
Posts: 3,107
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 95
I Root For: Flames & Canes
Location: Rome, GA
|
RE: Liberty to FBS
Guys, politics aside, LU met all the requirements for FBS. Attendance, facilities, financial, men & women's programs. On paper, they were ready to go FBS. With the SBC not inviting them, likely for social/political/economic issues, which is their prerogative, what was LU to do? They applied for a waiver and received it. If they had not received it, litigation was likely, and the NCAA knew their case was weak to win if challenged.
With this waiver granted, the NCAA has set a new standard of how programs can become FBS without an invite. If future programs are judged the same and allowed to become FBS meeting the regs, why not?
(This post was last modified: 02-19-2017 11:11 AM by NewTimes.)
|
|
02-19-2017 11:10 AM |
|
Stateman
Special Teams
Posts: 525
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation: 2
I Root For: East Tennessee
Location: Georgia
|
RE: Liberty to FBS
So the wavier will allow schools that may have aspirations such as Eastern Kentucky, Madison, and so forth, to move up if they meet the same criteria as Liberty. I think that is fine.
|
|
02-21-2017 11:39 AM |
|
GoBucsGo
1st String
Posts: 1,933
Joined: May 2007
Reputation: 14
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: Liberty to FBS
So keep in mind they hired Ian McCaw as their athletic director, who was formally at Baylor. McCaw should never be allowed by an athletic director at any NCAA program. I hope they have an enormous amount of trouble finding a conference that takes them. McCaw is an ace at "looking the other way" when it comes to sexual assault.
|
|
03-03-2017 10:21 AM |
|
Buccaneerlover
All American American
Posts: 8,063
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation: 57
I Root For: ETSU/Mid Majors
Location: Burb of MUSIC CITY!
|
RE: Liberty to FBS
(03-03-2017 10:21 AM)GoBucsGo Wrote: So keep in mind they hired Ian McCaw as their athletic director, who was formally at Baylor. McCaw should never be allowed by an athletic director at any NCAA program. I hope they have an enormous amount of trouble finding a conference that takes them. McCaw is an ace at "looking the other way" when it comes to sexual assault.
They've yet to find a home. Nobody in FBS wants them even with their facilities, and the reality is they'll stay in the Big South for all other sports, because the Big South needs numbers. Teams will play them, and it'll work out. I'm sure they're goal is follow the BYU model on a smaller scale for the forseeable future. Schedule home and homes with Sun Belt, C-USA, and MAC schools while they try to build.
I didn't understand why they hired Ian McCaw, there has to be more to the Baylor story that we're not hearing that justifies him getting a second chance this fast. Either that or they were desperate for someone with P5 experience.
|
|
03-03-2017 11:40 PM |
|